Imagebam vs ImageVenue

[vdat100]

I have found over the last month or so that ImageVenue is a much more efficient hosting service. On imagevenue the pics load much quicker and they are always there, you don't get those annoying blank spaces without some images. And have to reload the page.

I am just wondering what other members think.

[butler bill]

I agree, and no LIVE JASMINE adds.

[roadrunner4024]

I prefer Imagevenue, but that's because I'm on Dial-Up. With Imagebam I can only download about 50% of the pix that are posted the rest I don't get because it resets before It's finished and I don't get a complete download. Refreshing the page dosen't help. With Imagevenue It dosen't matter how long it takes, I still get a full dowload. Plus I've noticed that pages here load up faster when there are fewwer pix posted on Imagebam. Both host however are light years ahead of everything else IMHO as far as tracking and being stable.

[depravo]

When it comes to saving pictures from either, Window 7 sometimes changes the file so you can't see it and have to save it again.

[razorramone]

I agree, and no LIVE JASMINE adds.

That was all I needed to hear. Goooooooodbye ImageBam.

[Curmudgeon]

One thing in ImageBam's favor: it doesn't muck with file names. All ImageVenue file names are changed from name.jpg to something like 98765_name_4321_123lo.jpg. It's a pain in the butt if you're trying to keep files sorted by name.