Printable View
Ok, this might be me just having a bitch, but I think there should be a minimum size for a picture to be worthy of posting, I am just sick and tired of a particular member (Who is also a Moderator) flooding frequently single thumbnail size pics in numerous threads.
first off. since i post more than anyone in the fake thread I suggest you are referring to me...if not it makes no difference
If you dont like the pics dont comment on them or maybe you can take the time to post better ones instead of moaning.What the fuck have you contributed to the board...? 129 posts, I often did more in a day
It annoys me when people moan about what is posted.I post all pics REGARDLESS of size and quality.If you dont like it I suggest you dont comment.And starting threads where you publicly knock a moderator(whoever you refer to) will do you no good in the long run
Well there's a minimum and that's thumbs that are not allowed to be posted, otherwise there's not, but before you can see the size befoe download, I'm posting a lot of small sized pics in the Celbrities Forum that I catch from the news, small but hot news often and that's what I like to post, otherwise I also post much bigger posts in the Internet Models, Pornstars & other girls Forum, but also I'f I wish to post pics of a concrete girl; I search and then I post what I find REGARDLESS of size and quality, so Mesega as Gazo said you could also take the time of searching for better quality pics and post them instead of moaning you have been a memeber for more than two years and posted 0.17 posts a day... not a big record indeedQuote:
Originally Posted by Gazo
Thumbnails are generally not allowed...any submission that is too small to show up as a thumbnail on the board is usually deleted. And like my two collegues have stated...if you think you can do better, show us.
I agree with the other three members. If you do not like what you see, post what you do like. About 6 months ago I had 17 post. I now have over 500. I do not live on this Board, and I do not have high speed. Sometimes it takes me minutes to find, download and upload to this Board what I would like to see. Bitching does not accomplish much. Actions do. Just my opinion. :D
well said.Quote:
Originally Posted by robn1
In connection to the small pics mesega mentioned. A lot of members would prefer to see a fake of their fav celeb even if its a small pic rather than not see one at all.
In an ideal world all the pics would be huge and of great quality however when it comes to more obscure celebrities that option is not available.We already have enough rules to enforce as mods without finding fault with members who take the time to post pics that are small.
Like Markk and I mentioned we post pics regardless of size and quality as the board is better with them than without them.
i'd agree with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazo
So you see, what I often do is to seek in some magazines and f.e. I find that they publish pics from a premiere in Hollywood, with some 15 famous stars that showed up there, they publish one pic of each lady, may be two, I download them and may be find another site that publishes 8 more pics, same process and then I start posting the pics in some 14 threads, it often happens that I find one or two ladies that for whatever reason they do not have a thread at the Famous Board, f I decide to post the picturea I have to start a new thread for them and then I look for more pics in the internet.
It's really a lot of work and then often the pics are small and the results are not brilliant; it's much easier when I post 15 pics from the same girl in the "Internet Models, Pornstars & other Girls" Forum, that I download directly from my pc and then the quality is usually much better too!
But I speacilly like when I catch a pic from a star that had no had any post for sometime, let's say 3 months and then suddently you see that because I posted a, may be small pic, some other board members suddently remember her and then her thread is enriched with some more new posts.
I won't even give you the satisfaction of voting in this pole. The question I have. Is what the hell does the size of a pix have to do with the quality of one. Ive seen many pix that aren't even 150kb that outshine a lot that are over 1mb. Quality lies in the eye of the one looking at it. You could take ten of the best fakirs in the business and your not going to get them all to agree on what is a quality fake, simply because they all use different criteria, and the last thing they are looking at is the file size of a pix. I for one am quite gratefull for those that take the time and the work to do all the posting that they do. If I like what they post I save it, if not I just go to the next. Hell they post some of people I've never heard of. Guess I should start a Poll to limit which celebs can be posted. :D . Sorry for rambling, but this one really touched a nerve.
Limit the size of a post Geez, I'm going to have nightmares tonight.
Perfect summation :finga:Quote:
Originally Posted by MARKK
No, I was not referring to you!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazo
Yes you are right, I may have only 129 posts,but this is not the only board I visit, my preference is not to post too much here, as the uploading of a single pic at a time is a pain, but never the less, I note this board has 108742 registered users, so I reckon my minimal posting is probably a lot more than say 108000 other registered users.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazo
I was just making an observation, my own opinion, obviously there is no ability to comment here without crucifiction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazo
And last but not least, you actually wrote that like you really believe it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MARKK
I voted Don't care
MM
A lot of posters are not attaching directly to the board as a matter of fact you are using imagevenue, so not a good excuse for not posting more, But you don't need any excuse, you don't like to post much here and that's it, but then don't try to impose your rules, to people that have contributed much more than you ever did.Quote:
Yes you are right, I may have only 129 posts,but this is not the only board I visit, my preference is not to post too much here, as the uploading of a single pic at a time is a pain, but never the less, I note this board has 108742 registered users, so I reckon my minimal posting is probably a lot more than say 108000 other registered users.
It even took you one week to write again in this thread that was started by you!
There's no crucifition here, butQuote:
I was just making an observation, my own opinion, obviously there is no ability to comment here without crucifiction.
Who started a crucifiction? Don't tell me this is only an observation and by the way it is a lie as thums are not allowed, and no mod would post themQuote:
I am just sick and tired of a particular member (Who is also a Moderator) flooding frequently single thumbnail size pics in numerous threads.
I don't get the meaning of that sentence but it looks very much like you are suggesting that I'm not saying the truth. Is it so? I ask you kindly to clarify.Quote:
And last but not least, you actually wrote that like you really believe it.
in the end it all comes down to one thing.
Members would rather see a small pic than no pic at all. As roadrunner said size is not an indication of quality.There are plenty huge pics out there that serve only to show the glaring bad work involved.
No member or mod actively would post a small pic were a larger one available but sometimes we have to go with what we find
Cristal clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazo