Page 2 of 2 First 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: A.I. Fakes discussion

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    820
    Thanks Given
    7,710
    Thanks Received
    7,065
    Thanked in
    990 Posts

    Re: A.I. Fakes discussion

    I'm gonna be honest i don't like the AI fakes either.They look too cartoony and weird to me.Their faces look like a plastic surgeon's rendering of a celeb.Like you get the general idea who the celeb is but their noses and eyes are messed up along with their skin that looks to smooth and not real to me.
    Nods to the original scanners,poster & owners of the pics that should cover everyone.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to warren5150 For This Useful Post: PBandJordy
  3. # ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     
  4. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    8
    Thanks Given
    6,758
    Thanks Received
    16
    Thanked in
    7 Posts

    Re: A.I. Fakes discussion

    A completely different question on the side, do you even need it? I prefer to see celebrities as they are or if they have their pictures taken in some magazines (Playboy, etc.).

    ....(e) All posts must be written in English. This board is primarily an English speaking one and as such all posts must be written in English.
    Last edited by Turtle; February 19th, 2024 at 06:28 AM. Reason: Non English text

  5. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2024
    Posts
    8
    Thanks Given
    14
    Thanks Received
    30
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Re: A.I. Fakes discussion

    An interesting discussion here. What I don't understand is the absolute aversion of some to pure AI images or images created with the help of an AI, as I do.
    What distinguishes them from other fakes? Not much.
    There are good and bad ones in both, the manual Photoshop fakes and those created with AI support.
    Let's be honest, if you look at many fakes on the relevant sites, as well as here in the forum, you will see real crutches, especially in the area of Photoshop fakes, which look absolutely horrible, and make absolutely no desire to stimulate your imagination. And just because they're Photoshop handmade fakes doesn't mean they're sacred works of art if they look like a 3-year-old has been handed a pair of scissors, glue and a pile of newspapers.

    Good fakes are good fakes, no matter how they are created. And shit remains shit, regardless of whether I press flowers into it by hand or with AI pliers ;p

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to SetepenRa For This Useful Post: Bobby_Beemer
Page 2 of 2 First 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions