http://damimage.com please add this host
http://damimage.com please add this host
I would have to register to upload anything. I tried various methods. Not for me.
Thumbs down for me as well.
Hi!
I would like to use my own image hosting (although I have no problem with it being public, without registering, etc.). It's possible? Which are the requirements?
Although I have other scripts, I do not understand the reason for banning chevereto hosting.
Thanks in advanced
14. Banned Image hosts and sites:
or other hosts using Chevereto
The Following User Says Thank You to Turtle For This Useful Post: Dantithesis |
Hi!
Yes is public.
Obviously I could change the URL of the hosting to the main domain (or use another domain)
The example:
Ronda Rousey wallpaper naked
http://sexliesandfakes.com/hostingpo...per-naked.3gSv
Direct links
URL: http://sexliesandfakes.com/hostingporn/image/3gSv
url image: http://sexliesandfakes.com/hostingpo...f7b8f36-me.jpg
Thanks in adavanced!
This is a nice image host in my opinion, apparently run by ociotube.
UI is nice. Lightweight as far as scripts, ads and such. I had a few issues with it and sent a PM so we weren't going back and forth from here. He told me he could adjust the file size cap for FBoard as it was small. It was a register for more MBs and told him that wouldn't work. He said he could wave that. I didn't like the inability to right click to save. He said he could adjust that as well. Then I remembered about the duration caps on the last two that were denied. I asked about that and didn't hear back yet. Maybe he'll post the answer here.
He did say he wasn't trying to compete with the big sites, but wanted long term file stability.
Who is an owner of this host?
We already have allowed at least 2 very similar hostings (image-bugs.com & Imgcredit.xyz). Do we need next one just because someone want to earn on adds? Just for one user?
Big NO from me.
Hello,
- I'am faker. I like having my jobs on my own host.
- I also offer my host to other users (without registration or with registration).
No limit of photos.
With the guarantee of always being open.
- Honestly, I believe that my host can be complementary. About boards, about users and fakers.
Thnaks!
Regards
The Following User Says Thank You to ociotube For This Useful Post: Dantithesis |
Dear Sir,
I would like to request you to kindly add http://pixio.pw as an approved image host on your forum.
It is a completely popup free host which is stable as well as fast and has a proven track record of about 2 years in existence.
Maximum image upload size is 15 MB which seem to be sufficient for most needs. Can be increased if required.
Galleries can be created without registering on the site.
I shall be really grateful if you can grant the host approval on your forum
Example:
It's the same template as Image-bugs without their 14 unnecessary and intrusive scripts loading. It would be better if it had buttons and or arrows to view the gallery.
But, there is this from the Privacy page: "This is an example page for your Chevereto site. You can edit and learn from this file located in /content/pages/default/privacy.php. If you want a real world example you should check the contact page which is contact.php in the same folder."
And a Chevereto link later in the page. All hosts using Chevereto are banned from our site.
14. Banned Image hosts and sites:
.... 4shared.com
.... cocoimage.com
.... dippic.com
.... dumparump.com
.... ImageBunk.com
.... imagesion.com
.... Imgdino.com
.... ImGiga.com
.... Lazygirls.info
.... oron.com
.... photobucket.com
.... picfoco.com
.... picjackal
.... picsharebunny
.... shareapic.net
.... unleashedpics.com
.... uppix.info
.... or other hosts using Chevereto
Hi
As far as i know the ban on Chevereto sites must have happened approximately 8-10 years back because people were spamming using their version 1 & 2.0 script. It was a very basic script. Those sites and scripts are no where to be seen now a days because they were not compatible with php 7.x.x.
It has a gallery link under the image though no button. I would like to re-iterate the fact that it is a popup free hosting which in itself is a plus point.
Rest is up to you guys.
As far as the privacy page is concerned, it happened due to a recent update. It will have to be re-written.
- Why do we need paragraph 14 with some list of banned hosts, if we have paragraph 11 with allowed only hosts?
- I would vote to exclude radikal.ru from allowed - we have about 160 posts with it, except one from 2016, all other are 2013 and earlier.
- As of pixio.pw - we already have 2 hosts with same engine (script), those are working fine, that's why I don't see any point in allowing one more exactly the same.
Paragraph 14 is useful, in that hopefully members who see it will not be asking for us to allow the banned sites. Other than that, your point is well taken. I would have no issue with excluding radikal.ru going forward, given it hasn't been used in a few years. In regards to pixio.pw, I couldn't agree with you more pal.
Bookmarks